Skip to main content

Um, EHLO?!

So, I have to say what a drag it is to have 20+ .pst files from an Exchange 2000 server and having no way to import said .pst files at the server level into Exchange 2007.

Oh yes, I'm well aware of the SP1 option for the <!@%^%$#> Import-Mailbox Powershell command syntax, but, I'm also aware that SP1 is not yet out of beta. And even if it was today, it wouldn't have helped me 10 days ago.

Here's the situation. I'm in the middle of trying to migrate a small organization over from Windows 2000 DC's and Exchange 2000 to Windows Server 2003 + Exchange 2007, I run into what I am still dwelling on, no .pst import option.

Well, the two biggest problems / pain in the <!@%^%$#> on this project was the fact that 1) Active Directory has inconsistencies 2) Exchange 2000 is installed on a Domain Controller.

Now, what's the problem with that?

I can't ADPREP Active Directory with inconsistencies that are not easily resolved. But, for fun let's say I did. Ok, cool, so now I have a Windows 2000 domain that I can put a Windows Server 2003 server as a DC (but remember I can't). And let's say I get 2003 running AD, I can't install Exchange 2007 until I remove the Windows 2000 DC's (Exchange 2007 has to have 2003 DC's -only- due to schema updates). I can't successfully DCPROMO a server that is also running Exchange 2000 without it breaking Exchange upon reboot. Basically, security will be modified on the server running Exchange 2000 to a point that the services won't start thus the information store won't mount. So, sure, I can get the Windows 2000 DC's off so that I can install Exchange 2007 (even if I were to get the AD inconsistencies fixed), but if I can't get Exchange 2000 database to mount, then I can't move mailboxes over, so WTF is the point?

Yeah, so this was my dilemma a couple of weeks ago. What to do. Well, the amount of work trying to fix things and to try and get Exchange 2000 running were ridiculous to the point that I might as well just do a full blown migration. There were other stupid problems on this network anyway, so this was the shortest path of least resistance.

A simple Exmerge from Exchange 2000 provided me the .pst's and then I went to do the research on how to get them back into the new server. And to my sarcastic delight, left with no way to do so except for sitting at each machine. Blech.

And while I'm severely disappointed in how Exchange 2007 works so far, I'm stuck with it. And not a usual basher of Microsoft, in fact, I like the <!@%^%$#>. But the additional work created during the migration because of the lack of ability to import mailboxes into the new information store was a true pain in my <!@%^%$#>.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi,

You can get the import-mailbox functionality from our Beta 2, which is already available for download:

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/08/14/446656.aspx

If you have problems with it please shoot us a message on the EHLO web site and we can follow up.

Thanks,
Paul
Giggly Bits said…
Super Paul,

Thanks for the reply.

I did not see that was an option for me at the time, simply due to the lack of time I had. Basically, the network was literally ripped apart and put back together while the users were not on the network on Thursday and Friday of last week. With all of the other work that had to be performed, including the rocket scientist who had setup some clients to pop their mail to .pst's on a few machines instead of storing mail in the IS, there were much more larger and dumber problems to address than this, due to a lack of proper configuration on that network than should ever be explained. Anyway, the learning curve to Exhange 2007 is steep, and is going to be difficult to transition to, but the product works.

Thanks for the link.

Popular posts from this blog

Juniper / NetScreen Dual Untrust

Something I did recently using a SSG 20 with commercial T1 and Comcast and both default virtual routers. (You don't have to use two virtual routers, but here's why I did this at first). Initially, my client reported that Comcast was assigning DHCP to the firewall's interface. When DHCP is used, the default route created from DHCP cannot be modifed and will show up as a directly connected route, so it will have a higher metric (unless you modify your preference / metric settings, but I have not tried that) So, if Comcast is supposed to be the backup route, placing it in the untrust-vr and controlling traffic in the trust-vr worked great. This works fine with a static IP as well. Here we go: Here are the default zones in the default trust-vr. set zone "Trust" vrouter "trust-vr" set zone "Untrust" vrouter "trust-vr" I created a new custom zone and placed it in the untrust-vr set zone id 101 "Comcast" set zone "Comcast"

Devaluation of Technical Certifications In Progress

I received this email as a member of a Juniper group within Google, and I was a bit blown away by the fact that someone, first of all, would be willing to pay someone else to get them certified. But then I realized after some thought, while consulting with some of the knuckleheads that I have had to work with that have > 5 certifications all from different vendors, and couldn't possibly due the work they were hired for. Honestly. I've seen it and been dumbfounded by the amount of coin they were pulling in and then they would have me do the work. Awesome. Is this the end of how certifications are valued? I of course have NEVER thought highly of certifications. My biggest reason is because so many test questions are so loaded and NEVER straight forward and are so subjective that you have to guess what {Enter Vendor Name Here} wants instead of interesting factual information.  <!@%^%$#>  I hate tests but not enough to be a  <!@%^%$#>   <!@%^%$#>  to pay someon